Appeal denied for jailhouse confidant of reputed Boston Strangler George Nassar

By Jay Lindsay
Associated Press

BOSTON β€” The state’s highest court yesterday denied an appeal in the 1967 murder conviction of George Nassar, a remorseless killer who some believe is the real Boston Strangler.

Nassar’s appeal before the Supreme Judicial Court came after his case lay dormant for more than 20 years. During that time, Nassar was implicated by various people close to the case as the real Boston Strangler, who killed 13 women between 1962 and early 1964.

He has denied he had anything to do with the deaths, and his attorney, Claudia Bolgen, repeated the denial yesterday.

Nassar, now 75, was 15 when he killed a Lawrence store clerk in 1948. He was paroled in 1961, then charged in October 1964 with shooting an Andover gas station attendant to death as the man begged for mercy.

Nassar’s case before the state’s highest court concerned a motion he filed to indicate an intention to appeal the 1982 denial of a new trial in the second killing. But he never acted, and the matter was dismissed in November 1983.

In 2006, Nassar, who is serving a life sentence and is known for an extraordinarily high IQ, argued in court filings that he couldn’t make his case because he was in federal prison in Leavenworth, Kansas, without access to Massachusetts legal materials.

The court noted yesterday that Nassar was back in Massachusetts in December 1983 and didn’t inquire about the case then or for more than two decades after.

Bolgen said she was disappointed in the decision, but said Nassar had a pending motion for a new trial in Essex County that she was confident would be granted.

The motion claims the judge gave erroneous jury instructions, including one involving a witness photo identification, and questions whether Nassar was advised of his right to testify, Bolgen said.

Bolgen said she could not comment on why there was such a gap in litigation in the case, but said Nassar is innocent of the 1964 killing.

“We’re hoping for justice, that’s all I can say, even after this late date,” she said.

While in jail, Nassar befriended Albert DeSalvo, who had been arrested for sexual assault in November 1964. The next year, Nassar told his attorney, F. Lee Bailey, that DeSalvo, another client of Bailey’s, was the Boston Strangler.

DeSalvo then confessed in remarkable detail to Bailey, who told the story in court in hopes of convincing the jury considering the sexual assault charges that DeSalvo was insane. It didn’t work, and DeSalvo was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.

DeSalvo later recanted his confession and was killed in prison in 1973. In 2001, forensic scientists announced that DNA evidence taken from the body of the strangler’s final victim didn’t match DeSalvo’s.

Ames Robey, a former prison psychologist who analyzed both DeSalvo and Nassar, has said Nassar was a misogynistic, psychopathic killer who was a far more likely suspect than DeSalvo. Some followers of the case said Nassar was the real strangler and fed DeSalvo details of the murders so he could confess and gain notoriety.

In a 1999 interview with The Boston Globe, Nassar denied involvement in the strangler murders, but said the speculation killed any chance he had for parole.

“I had nothing to do with it,” he said. “I’m convicted under the table, behind the scenes.”

I am and have always been a huge history buff, and The Boston Strangler case has always intrigued me. I’ve always wondered if this guy was The Real Boston Strangler.


2 thoughts on “HISTORY’S MYSTERIES

  1. I was fascinated by the Boston Strangler too. Not that I would like to meet the creep, but I always wondered how people could feel so entitled to cause families so much grief for the sake of their orgasms.

  2. I have this morbid fascination with serial killers, too. I don’t understand how their mind works, how they can justify it to themselves, just the… psychology of it all, I guess.

    I know… it’s sick.

    If my day off happens to fall during the week, I will lock the doors and curl up on the couch with my blanket to watch any of the Crime Files shows that are on… Forensic Files, Snapped, whatever.

    I get it from my mom. It’s not like I want to be “just like them” — these total psychos, when I grow up… I just… am weirdly interested in it.

    Glad to see I’m not the only person out there who is a history buff with an interest in serial killers and stuff.

    Sorry I haven’t been around much lately! Still love your blog, though! πŸ™‚

    Take care!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s